Competency Based Approach for Refugee Integration in Higher Education: Ci-RES project as a case study

Course Leader: Naouel Abdellatif Mami

Home Institution: Mohamed Lamine Debaghine, Sétif 2 University, Algeria

Course pre-requisite(s): B2 Level in English/Basic knowledge about approaches to teaching in Higher Education/ Basic knowledge about refugee situation, integration and education

 

Course Overview

This theme focuses on competency-based learning as a key strategy for an effective integration of refugees in higher education.

The training courses of Module 2 of the CI-RES project are going to be used in this course as a multiplier effects of best practice learning for teacher-researchers and

refugee students. It is therefore a global training plan on a learning model based on acquisition and development of skills, in a context of vocational training for inclusion. At the end of the training, the various participating education actors should be able to:

  • to identify and understand the educational potential of the skills to obtain a

meaningful learning about human rights ". However, as Henri Bourdreault specifies, in his work on competence-based learning, competence cannot be learned through a simple process of transmission of information in the classroom. It is the result of the subject's reflexivity in the face of a situation in a specific context. Based on this observation, as part of our training focused on the acquisition and development of skills, all participating educational actors, at the end of this training module :

  • Be able to distinguish between learning objects in order to facilitate the process of integrating refugees in higher education;
  • Be able to develop concepts related to human rights and make them perceptible and understandable;
  • Apply concepts related to human rights by contextualizing them through activities learning with real meaning for learners;
  • Finally, think about placing learners in different situations and contexts so that they can demonstrate their human rights skills.

Learning Outcomes

 General and specific skills:

at the end of the course the participating teachers should be able to recognize the pedagogical potential,  general and specific skills described below to achieve meaningful learning rights, as well as incorporating these skills into their course planning in an integrative approach oriented towards the effective application of the knowledge acquired to make effective integration of refugee students into higher education.

participants should be able to respond effectively to the goals described below:

GENERAL SKILLS

1 Global Citizenship (GC): A set of practical knowledge (concepts, skills and attitudes) that are necessary to interact positively with people of identities, perspectives and cultural backgrounds, as well as to act successfully on issues

of local and global interest. It includes interpersonal skills (e.g. active listening, perspective, mediation or conflict resolution), as well as interpersonal skills (eg. e.g. awareness and control of one's own emotions, feelings or cultural biases, religious or ethnic) and other teamwork skills (e.g. leadership, engagement, sharing of responsibility or willingness to help and collaborate in various contexts of job).

2 Learn to learn (LL): Ability to organize and regulate learning in a way

increasingly efficient and autonomous according to its own objectives, context and needs. This competence enables the acquisition of new knowledge, skills and attitudes, as well as solve problems by applying solutions with dexterity in a variety of contexts, including both personally and professionally, individually or as a group. It is be able to learn with others and cooperate effectively in the performance of joint tasks.

 It is also about becoming aware of your own skills and your own limitations, the ability to effectively plan own learning tasks, to manage effectively the necessary resources, techniques, skills and learning strategies.

The course also involves the ability to self-assess and self-regulate performance at cognitive and emotional levels, optimizing the capacities to overcome obstacles and limitations.

It is also about having an intellectual curiosity and an intrinsic motivation to face and overcome difficulties successfully, maintain ethical behavior and a positive attitude towards learning and improvement and for the realization of a more just and more society fair.

3 Digital Competence (DC): Digital competition involves critical use and security of information society technologies for work, leisure and communication. It is based on basic ICT skills: using computers to retrieve, evaluate, store, produce, present and exchange information, and communicate and participate in collaborative networks on the Internet.

4 Communication (C): This skill refers to the use of language as an instrument of oral and written communication, representation, interpretation and understanding of reality, construction and transmission of knowledge and the organization and self-regulation of thought, emotions and behavior. It also includes the ability to express and interpret oral and written concepts, thoughts, feelings, facts and opinions,

as well as communicating appropriately in a wide variety of situations, at least

in a foreign language at the end of basic education.5 Ethics and values ​​orientation (EVO): Ability to respect, recognize and transmit fundamental values ​​in the process of integrating refugees into higher education, such as freedom, equity, equality, solidarity, active respect, dialogue, responsibility, justice and respect for diversity. Assessment of the role of international texts relating to human rights, such as the Universal Declaration, to guide competitive performance and

global governance.

 SPECIFIC SKILLS

 In order to facilitate the acquisition of the general skills provided for in the present training plan, the expected learning outcomes are specified below as key descriptors:

 Global Citizenship (GC):

1.1 Demonstrate knowledge and critical understanding of the world.

1.2 Maintain active listening, perspective-taking and cooperation skills

1.3 Show flexibility and adaptability in our way of acting.

1.4 Mediation and conflict resolution skills.

1.5 Awareness and control of own emotions, feelings or prejudices.

 2 Learn to learn (LL)::

 2.1 Autonomy in the planning, assessment and management of learning processes.

2.2 Analytical and critical thinking skills.

3 Digital Competence (DC):

 3.1 Technological mastery.

3.2 Digital citizenship

4 Communication (C):

 4.1 Linguistic, communicative and multilingual skills.

5 Ethics and values ​​orientation (EVO)

5.1 Valuing human dignity and human rights.

5.2 Valuing cultural diversity

5.3 Promote democracy, justice, equity, equality and the rule of law

Course Content

  1. The right to education, a tool for personal development and empowerment
  2. The distinction between education and learning
  3. Recognizing Refugee Non-Formal Learning: An Incentive for Reform in Host Countries

3.1. Formal and non-formal learning

3.2. Informal apprenticeship

3.2. Informal apprenticeship

  1. Competency-based education: a type of situated learning

5.1. The choice of skills to recognize

5.2. The “soft” or “life” skills

5.3. The skills of the 21st

5.4. The skills of the future

5.5. The role of higher education in promoting student civic engagement activities

  1. Competency-based education planning: basic guidelines for promoting human rights learning
  2. Assessment of competency-based learning

conclusions

Instructional Method

Lectures will be based on conferences, seminars, work and individual activities and presentation

 

Required Course Materials

Allias, S. 2011. Using learning outcomes to make educational judgements: Some practical and conceptual issues. Validierung und Politik/Validation and Learning Policy. Bohlinger and Münchausen. eds. Bonn, BIBB, pp.145–66.

 

Bardak, U. 2016. Diversity of education and skills support for refugees in the European Neighborhood Region. NorragNews, 53, pp. 70–71.

 

Bohlinger, S. 2008. Competences as the core element of the European qualifications framework. European Journal of Vocational Training, 42/43 (2007/3, 2008/1), pp. 96–112.

 

CEDEFOP (European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training). 2012. Learning outcomes approaches in VET curricula: The impact of learning outcomes. Luxembourg, Office for Official Publications of the European Union. (Research paper no. 29).

 

CONSEIL DE L’EUROPE (2016). Compétences pour une culture de la démocratie -Vivre ensemble sur un pied d’égalité dans des sociétés démocratiques et culturellement diverses: https://rm.coe.int/16806ccc08

 

Hoskins, B. and Deakin Crick, R. 2010. Competences for learning tolearn and active citizenship: Different currencies or two sides of the same coin? European Journal of Education, 45(1), pp. 121–137.

 

Jarvis, P. 2006. Towards a Comprehensive Theory of Human Learning: Lifelong learning and the learning society. (Vol. 1). Abingdon, Routledge.

 

Josselin, M. et Chochard, Y. 2017. Les compétences du futur. L’Observatoire compétences-emplois, UQAM. Bulletin de l’OCE : Juin, Vol. 8, N°1, https://oce.uqam.ca/competences-futur/

 

Mezirow, J. 1990. Fostering Critical Reflection in Adulthood: A guideto transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco.

 

Jossey-Bass. Mojab, S. and Carpenter, S. 2011. Learning by dispossession: Democracy promotion and civic engagement in Iraq and the United States. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 30, pp. 549–563.

 

Morrice, L. 2013. Learning and refugees: Recognizing the darker sideof transformative learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 63(3), pp. 251–271.

 

Ouellet, D. et Hart, S. A. 2013. Les compétences du 21ème siècle. L’Observatoire compétencesemplois, UQAM. Bulletin de l’OCE : Décembre, Vol. 4, N°4. https://oce.uqam.ca/lescompetences-qui-font-consensus/

 

Straka, G. K. 2005. Informal learning: Genealogy, concepts, antago- nisms and questions. In: K. Künzel. ed. International Yearbook of Adult Education, pp. 31–32, 93–136. Köln, Böhlau.

 

Taylor, M. 2007. An update of transformative learning theory: A critical review of the empirical research (1999–2005). International Journal of Lifelong Education, 26(2), pp. 173–191.

 

International Meeting of Experts: Towards policy framework for securing the recognition, regularization and certification of non-formal education. Creating synergies between formal and non-formal settings in the Arab region, 27–29 January 2016. Beirut, UNESCO.

 

UNESCO. 2015a. Education 2030. Incheon Declaration and Framework for Action for the Implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4: Ensure inclusive and equitable quality education and promote life- long learning for all. Paris, UNESCO.

 

UNESCO. 2015b. Bridging Learning Gaps for Youth. UNESCO education response to the Syria crisis (2015–2016). Paris, UNESCO. UNHCR, 2015. Education and protection, Education: Issue Brief 1, http://www.unhcr.org/560be0dd6.html

 

UNHCR, 2016. Missing out: Refugee education in crisis, http://www.unhcr.org/ missing-out-stateof-education-for-the-worlds-refugees.html Webb, S. 2015. Learning to be through migration: Transformation learning and the role of learning communities. International Journal of Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning, 8(1), pp. 62– 84.

Assessment

(A description of the means of evaluation to be used in the course: The purpose of evaluation is to provide feedback to students on their learning, as well as to permit the instructor to assign a fair grade at the end of the course. Providing explicit information about assignments and grading procedures will clarify expectations and allay student anxiety, while supporting students in pacing their studies, gauging their progress, and achieving learning outcomes. )

Module Assessment

- Group Work: Presentation (weight 30%) [each group member will get the same grade based on the group performance] [Length 500 words in ppt format excluding images]

- Individual Work: Academic Essay (weight 70%) [Length 2500 words]